On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pranesh Prakash <[email protected]> wrote:
> What all would be our reasons for opposing this?
add lack of ooxml interoperabity etc from previous discourses.
\begin{itemize}
\item {It is not application independent.}
\item {Does not support Pre-Existing Standards.}
\item {Depends on Proprietary Vendor-Specific Tech.}
\item {It Neglects Standards like MathML, SVG because of M\$ Corporate
interests.}
\item {Not truly backward compatible as M\$ Word is all Closed Source Stuff.}
\item {permits proprietary extensions to create vendor lock-in.}
\item {Is not compatible with existing open standards like ODF}
\item {It is not Legally Safe: Competitors cannot be sure}
\item {The full spectrum of all possible MS-OOXML implementations is
not understood}
\end{itemize}
Best
A. Mani
--
A. Mani
CU, ASL, AMS, CLC, CMS
http://www.logicamani.in
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
