On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Indranil Das Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Mention of only a single OEM product in an RFP does not establish/indicate > that a bribe has been proffered. >
It does not establish, but is highly suggestive. They are not following open standards. AFAIK they do not have a concept of open bribes. > The technical criteria required for a CP does not even quite fit the > business profile of Microsoft India, at least directly. > But the candidate system and examination system are already being locked in. CP is being forced to run in M$ windows. M$ definitely wants s/w to run on its systems only. I do not see how your point makes sense. > If you *must* search for a 'ghost-in-the-machine', read the RFP closely in > the *other* parts, the 'lock-in' is elsewhere and otherwise :) Explain. I don't have time to look into this. Best A. Mani -- A. Mani CU, ASL, AMS, CLC, CMS http://www.logicamani.in _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
