On Tuesday 21 April 2015 02:18 PM, kk wrote: > > Sounds interesting. > and in "other issues" are we also taking up Accessibility? > As an accessibility advocate, I might be intrested to come over. > happy hakcing.
Krishnakant, We will take up the general question of regulation of the Internet is public interest, with considerable focus on net neutrality and, as said, other aspects are also open to be discussed. You are welcome to bring in 'accessibility' issues and how they connect to Internet regulation, and perhaps even to net neutrality... parminder > Krishnakant. > > On Tuesday 21 April 2015 01:31 PM, parminder wrote: >> Dear All >> >> We are planning a workshop on /*Regulating the Internet in public >> interest - Net neutrality and other issues' *//**/on the 2nd of May >> in New Delhi. It will be held from 930 AM to 430 PM at the India >> Islamic Cultural Centre, on Lodhi Road. >> >> >> A short note on he workshop is below. If the matter interests any of >> you and youd like to attend please write to me offline. The digital >> space is soon going to be a very importance one for global >> contestations around trade and other forms of economic relationships, >> and it is time that progressive groups begin to involve themselves in >> this area. >> >> Happy to provide any additional information or clarification... >> >> Best, parminder, >> IT for Change (www.ITforChange.net ) >> >> >> With Net Neutrality suddenly becoming a very hot news topic, we will >> like to have a more in depth look at issues related to regulation of >> the Internet, including the net neutrality issue. We will proceed >> from the wide and deep social impact that the Internet is causing, >> which trend is only going to furtherintensify. From such an >> examination, we will try to understand what kind of regulation of the >> Internet may be needed, not only in the infrastructure layer (the net >> neutrality issue belongs here) but also the application and content >> layers, bringing into the discussion the increasingly monopolistic >> and gate-keeping role that big Internet corporations play with regard >> to so many important social activities and systems today. It is >> unfortunate that net neutrality is often presented as a telecom >> sector versus Internet sector issue. TRAI's (Telecom Regulatory >> Authority of India) consultation paper titled 'Regulatory Framework >> for OTT Services (read, Internet Services)' , which triggered the >> current net neutrality tempest, seems to err towards such a false >> binary. Unfortunately, most responses to the paper, while rightly >> seeking 'net neutrality', appear to further reinforce such a binary. >> >> It is important to get out of this problematic framing of the problem >> as a kind of opposition between the telecom sector and the Internet >> sector, and instead apply the lens of public interest to the issue of >> regulation of the Internet. Internet is today not only the central >> paradigm of our communication realm but increasingly also forms the >> key element of the digitally-mutating new social systems in >> practically all areas, ranging from media, entertainment, business, >> work, and governance to education, health and livelihood support. >> Ensuring an egalitarian architecture of the Internet therefore >> becomes a key determinant of the the possible egalitarian nature of >> our emerging social systems in various areas. It is this egalitarian >> principle that underlies the need for 'net neutrality', but it may >> also require appropriate regulation in other layers of the Internet >> beyond the infrastructure layer. 'Neutrality' of the Internet is >> important for free, open and equitable access to information and >> knowledge, a truly democratic public discourse, freedom of >> expression, decentralised economic activity, and, in general, for >> egalitarian social systems, and to ensure economic and social justice >> for all. >> >> /*The workshop is intended to be a preliminary exercise *//*for >> progressive actors *//*to begin engaging with this key policy area, >> and does not pre-suppose any kind of *//*specialised*//*knowledge >> from the participants.*/ Depending on how the discussions go, >> however, it is possible that we may also be able to frame a short >> response to the consultation paper floated by TRAI. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> network mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in > > > > _______________________________________________ > network mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
