* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-14 17:21:54] > > > > Page 32: Logical Interfaces. > > > > * If non-failover addresses are added to underlying interfaces, they > > > > will be moved to the IPMP interface, yes? > > > > > > not when they are added -- when they are brought up. i've added the same > > > note as in section 5.8 to clarify. > > > > ...it seems that the confusion spread. It's actually non-non-failover > > addresses (i.e. normal ones) that will be moved when they come up :-) > > the text states "any logical interfaces that are not marked IFF_NOFAILOVER > will be brought up on the appropriate IPMP group interface". that seems > correct to me -- do you just mean that the wording is confusing?
I've caused confusion, sorry. I wrote "If non-failover addresses are added...will be moved" and you clarified that it's when they are marked UP. In fact it's actually normal (non-non-failover) addresses that are moved, so my original question was incorrectly phrased. The document is correct, there's no need to change. dme. -- David Edmondson, Solaris Engineering, Sun Microsystems. _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
