> I entirely concede that the current project does not see the value of > link names less restrictive than what IP currently supports and that the > project should not be expected to take on additional work to provide > features that have only hypothetical value. But that doesn't excuse the > project from taking into account future uses of the infrastructure it > creates and avoiding mistakes that will prevent someone else from > innovating in the future.
But we *have* taken it into account -- there is nothing in our design that requires the trailing digit -- we just have a policy enforcement of an existing rule. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
