On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:59:08PM -0800, Erik Nordmark wrote: > If we have some targeted hook somewhere which can do queuing and/or > rewriting of the headers, then I think that the order matters. > But I think this can be addressed by explicitly making such hooks single > consumer - not allowing multiple parties to register. > > Should there be hooks that are for observability only, or even those > that can do pass/drop, then there isn't much of an issue with the order. > Thus such targeted hooks can potentially allow multiple registrants.
There should be a single re-writer, and at worst "around" hooks to observe packets before and after re-writes (someone's bound to want that). No? Nico -- _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
