>
> Why not flesh out M_MULTIDATA further?  It has a nice programming API, and
> already has support for attributes.
>

M_MULTIDATA messages are not what I'd call *real* STREAMs messages
anyway since you cannot use all the standard message manipulation
functions on them. If the network stack goes down this route then
perhaps it would be better to just stop pretending that they are
STREAMs messages, extend them as required and stop using STREAMs in
the stack.

  Paul

--
Paul Durrant
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pdurrant
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
networking-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to