On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Peter Memishian wrote:

Right, I don't think it does -- and ifconfig is already hopeless. I think it would be better to come up with a new program (ipadm?) which provided a sane way to view and administer IP interfaces.

As a data-point. Another system abandoned ifconfig too and provided a new tool for configuring IP. That new tool is indeed more consistent in interface and better.

However, the backwards compatibility issues don't go away. Some proportion of end-users will continue to use (the bitrotting) ifconfig rather than the new tool - which sometimes leads to subtle problems due to one tool configuring things slightly differently to the other - particularly with respect to features whose configuration is more refined with the newer tool.

I.e.: A new tool only avoids backward-compatibility problems in the syntax, but not always in how the system ends up being configured (unless you remove the old tool completely, or /don't/ abandon it).

Hence there /may/ be some value in considering rehabilitating the syntax of the existing tool instead..

regards,
--
Paul Jakma,
Network Approachability, KISS.          http://quagga.ireland.sun.com/
Sun Microsystems, Dublin, Ireland.      tel: EMEA x19190 / +353 1 819 9190
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to