Peter> ... it seems like NWAM could be that "broader Peter> framework" -- but that's up to them :-)
JBeck> So if we build it, will you come? JBeck> I.e., if NWAM provides such a framework, will the Clearview Vanity JBeck> Names project team work with us to take advantage of it? Peter> What do you have in mind? I view it the other way around... I don't have anything in specific mind... yet. My point was merely that we (NWAM & Clearview) should be talking, and the rest of your message seems to support that. I imagine we'll talk off-line then get a related (but new) thread going on both nwam-discuss and clearview-discuss. -- John http://blogs.sun.com/jbeck _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
