Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Peter Memishian wrote:
> I'd like to have folks review the work at >
http://cr.grommit.com/~gdamore/dmfe_gldv3/webrev
> > * This will make dmfe a DLPI style 1 provider as well. (A
good > thing, IMO, DLPI style 2 is a "bug".)
Yes. FWIW, all the Clearview /dev/net nodes are DLPI style-1 *only*.
Since those will be what applications interact with in the future,
we're on our way to getting rid of "style-2 disease".
> * I'd love to replace the dmfe-custom loopback ioctls with
standards > sys/netlb.h ioctls. However, I'm not sure if any
consumers are going to > be impacted.
IIRC, switching to sys/netlb.h would allow SunVTS coverage.
Yes, I believe that is true. What I'm not sure of, is whether there
is a custom SunVTS module in place for dmfe. (It wouldn't surprise to
learn that there is.) Is SunVTS open sourced? :-)
The lookback test of Sun VTS is quite special. It seems it requires code
changes in Sun VTS for new driver supporting. I'm not sure why? Does
anybody know about it?
--
Cheers,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oliver Yang | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | x82229 | Work from home
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
