Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Dave Miner wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Thanks, John. That may be it. Hopefully the fix is not just for DHCP
interfaces, since I
am using a fixed address.
First, netstrategy returned what it's supposed to in this case: "ufs
none none" is the right answer here.
I'd be somewhat surprised if the CR John referenced is the problem;
that CR has entirely to do with the case of interfaces for which the
driver is supplied by an ITU. As you're using e1000g, and the output
shows that it's been found, I don't think that's it. The cause here
appears to be that the properties which should have been populated out
of the GRUB setting weren't, as shown in this excerpt from your output:
+ prtconf -v /devices
+ sed -n /boot-mac/{;n;p;}
bootmac=
+ cut -f 2 -d '
+ prtconf -v /devices
+ sed -n /host-ip/{;n;p;}
hostip=
+ cut -f 2 -d '
+ prtconf -v /devices
+ sed -n /subnet-mask/{;n;p;}
netmask=
+ cut -f 2 -d '
+ prtconf -v /devices
+ sed -n /router-ip/{;n;p;}
def_route=
Each of those properties should have a value, which install-discovery
uses to configure the interface and the default route into Solaris.
They don't, so somewhere between GRUB and the kernel this got dropped.
You aren't using an outdated version of GRUB, are you?
Dave
Hi Dave, I believe it is the latest. I did an install of 64 via DVD
using NFS media
yesterday to make sure I was running the latest. This is onto the first
disk, since
installing onto the second does not update GRUB. Should I do an installgrub
while booted from 64?
I did an installgrub while booted from NV64, and still get this error.
Steffen
GNU GRUB version 0.95 (632K lower / 4062144K upper memory)
I do see an entry in help called 'bootfs [ZFSBOOTFS]'
Steffen
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
