Kacheong Poon wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
# Set TCP_STRONG_ISS to be:
# 0 = Old-fashioned sequential initial sequence number generation.
# 1 = Improved sequential generation, with random variance in
increment.
# 2 = RFC 1948 sequence number generation, unique-per-connection-ID.
#
TCP_STRONG_ISS=1
Why shouldn't this be set to case 2 as the default ?
AFAIK, it is a performance consideration. I don't know
if the performance hit is still a concern given our
new hardware... BTW, there is an RFE 4625629 for this.
What tests should be run to help make the decision ?
--
Darren J Moffat
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
