Richard Lowe wrote: > Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> *Synopsis*: "in.rwhod" lacks usable configuration >>> Due to a change of Responsible manager requested by [EMAIL PROTECTED], >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is now the responsible manager for: >>> >>> CR 4296835 changed on Sep 3 2007 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value >>> ============= >>> >>> Responsible Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Status 4-Defer 6-Fix Understood >>> SubStatus No Resource Available >>> >>> ====================== =========================== >>> =========================== >>> >> Erm... why ? AFAIK I filed the sponsor request long ago and I just >> waiting that a sponsor somehow magically appears... the "resource" who >> writes the patch is available... >> > > I'd say the change should be reversed, and the bug keyworded > oss-request, if it isn't already. > > (looking back through mail, it looks like you requested a sponsor for > a duplicate, maybe the keyword didn't get moved when the newer was > closed dup?)
Apologies, due to an organization change, thousands of bugs were being sorted and reassigned - I failed to spot the oss-request keyword in this case. I've restored the previous state. (Although a sponsor still needs to be forthcoming) -Jimmo _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
