Roman Divacky writes: > ok... it worked.. for you interested here is a patch for pidentd: > > http://www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/pidentd.diff
I don't think I'd do that. Systems running code prior to S10 08/07 will still need the ipcl_conn_fanout mechanism, so deleting it might be a bit premature. The bigger concern is in burying these undocumented header files in the midst of this application. I realize that pidentd naturally has its hands all over the kernel, but depending on the layout of these structures bumps the risk level up another notch. At a minimum, I think we need to start thinking about a better way forward here. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
