On 2008?10?28? 11:50, Nils Goroll wrote: > Hi Cathy, > >> But I'd rather not holding smac_mutex when calling mac_open(). What you >> should do is to hold smac_mutex and then "goto done" when mac_open() fails. > > I've updated the webrev. I had thought about this and I thought it was only > consequent to also hold the lock when calling mac_open as it was also helt > when > calling mac_close. > > At any rate, This way might save a deadlock in future. > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nigoroll/4289_softmac_create_task__mutex_exit_on_unhelt_mutex/ > > Looks good.
Thanks - Cathy > > TODO: > > - need at least positive review > - need a sponsor > > Thanks, > > Nils > _______________________________________________ > networking-discuss mailing list > [email protected] _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
