James Carlson wrote:
> A union of sockaddr_in and sockaddr_in6 would be fine.
>
> I just find it hard to argue against sockaddr _in general_.
Are you saying that any new interface which needs to pass
IP address around _must_ use sockaddr_* regardless of
the usage? May be I am the minority here. I don't think
it will generally make code simpler nor more uniform...
It just wastes space uniformly :-} Just my $0.02...
--
K. Poon.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
