On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 12:40 -0800, Peter Memishian wrote: > > I guess it's related to 6791246. > > Indeed. Would be great to get that fix back ASAP.
Agreed. Given the simplicity of the fix, it would seem very much possible to fix this in 110. -Seb _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
