> Are there any plans to raise the stability at all (or otherwise > provide a way to obtain the information)? Also are there any plans > for upgrading the stability of any of anything in libdladm? LLDP > supports sending information about aggregrations, vlans, as well as > other things -- which suggests a close relationship with [lib]dladm -- > It could always periodically run dladm and parse the output it if need > be, but why go through all that if it's not necessary.
Are you targeting the ON consolidation? If so, the current classification is fine for your use. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
