On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:42 -0400, [email protected] wrote: > On (03/23/09 14:08), Sebastien Roy wrote: > > # ipadm {create,modify}-interface [-t] [-f {inet, inet6}] \ > > [-if6_intf_id=<IPv6 Interface ID>] \ > > [-O <interface sub-options>] <interface> > : > > To that end, the IPv6 interface ID doesn't belong here IMO. This feels > > like an IP interface property that has a default value and that is > > settable through something like "ipadm set-prop -p interface-id=::1 > > net0". > > The problem with that concept is that by the time you do the set-prop, > several addresses may have been autoconfigured with the "other" interface-id.
I don't follow. That seems like an implementation artifact. Why couldn't the property be applied before addresses are added to the interface? -Seb _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
