On (04/22/09 10:15), Erik Nordmark wrote: > >> Yes, and that's a valid argument in defense of interface enable/disable. >> For example, routing daemons like quagga already have code to deal >> with interface up/down notifications, and have historically had to >> maintain special code to deal with the "address up/down" state. > > What does quagga do with things like the duplicate status in BSD? > (ifconfig -a reports such things for addresses in BSD AFAIK.)
do you mean "duplicate" as in DAD-duplicate? I've not checked into this lately (I can find out).. but afaik, the idea of duplicacy by allowing the same address to be added on the same interface on a system twice is unique to Solaris. --Sowmini _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
