On (04/24/09 17:57), Erik Nordmark wrote: > Note however that enabled/disabled is an administrative notion has in my > mind it has nothing to do with recovering from DAD failures!
correct. For dad we'd have the "refresh" command. > I suspect the kernel needs some work before we fully endorse the > disable-address. For instance, today IPv6 assumes that the link-local > lives on :0, but what happens when :0 is disabled? (I guess some kernel > code just blasts along using that disabled address.) today the kernel just disables all the ipv6 addresses - in.ndpd notices that the link-local disappeard and takes down the all the autoconfigured addrs... we should retain that behavior _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
