On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 03:38:54PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
<SNIP!>
> > If so, I'm golden. :)
>
> I think so. Besides, I still can't quite figure out how setting
> source port on a per-packet basis would work or why you'd ever want to
> have it. I *think* it'd be similar to binding that port, but that
> means a scan through all the conn_ts on every packet, and when you're
> done, all you'd have is garbage -- you'd be using a port that's not
> actually bound, *or* you'd be absconding with someone else's port.
I was thinking about UDP 500 and UDP 4500, both of which are properly bound
ports belonging to in.ike{,v2}d. I am indeed golden.
Thanks again for your patience,
Dan
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
