On (06/09/09 09:31), Garrett D'Amore wrote: > * dladm brussels support -- this is a bigger issue. Some of these > GLDv3 drivers have moved away from implementing their own ndd support, > and are instead relying on simpler interfaces in Brussels. > > Is this worth doing? IMO, it is. But I'm keen to hear other opinions.
Unless we also backported some of the Clearview bits which Brussels was layered, the implementation of the GLD pieces would be quite different (though the drivers would be similar). This would also be a non-trivial amount of work.. so I would also be interested in hearing how much demand there is for the backport.. _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
