On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:33:56PM -0700, Nicolas Droux wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Renee Danson Sommerfeld wrote:
>
>> As I said, NWAM phase 1 will ignore VNICs.  They will not show up in
>> the Automatic NCP.
>>
>> At the request of folks who (as I understand it) wish to have VNICs
>> created on a system which is running NWAM, the start method for the
>> nwam
>> service will be instantiated at boot time, just as they are in the
>> start
>> method for network/physical:default (the alternative to nwam).  But
>> because NWAM phase 1 does not yet have the flexibility to manage VNICs
>> and etherstubs and other advanced link types, those links will be
>> ignored, and not added to the Automatic NCP.
>
> That is a major pain point right now, so that will help.
>
> Are you also going to instantiate user-flows when is NWAM enabled? These
> should be simpler to handle since they should be transparent to NWAM.
  
Yes, I was just talking with Mike Lim about that the other day;
I agree that we need to do that as well.
  
>> If users wish to create their own configuration in a User NCP, it is
>> possible to add VNICs there; however, they will be treated by NWAM
>> exactly as other physical links.  They must still be created using
>> dladm.
>
> And conversely it will be possible to configure a User NCP which allows
> the administrator to instruct NWAM to not plumb and configure other
> (possibly non-VNIC) data links?
  
Yes.  The User NCP specifies exactly what to do with links and
interfaces.  This has been part of the design, described in the
nwam spec (http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nwam/p1spec), for
quite a long time now.

> It would be nice in the future to make this more automatic, i.e. instead
> of using the data link class, query the zone/VM configuration to
> determine whether a data link should be plumbed/configured by NWAM in
> global zone/dom0.

There are a great many things that would be nice for nwam to do in
the future.  Right now, we're trying really hard to lay the groundwork
by getting phase 1 integrated.  Please file RFEs for features you'd
like to see in the future.

-renee
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to