On (09/17/09 14:28), James Carlson wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > I've added code that will ignore the RTM_LOSING if there's
> > no alternate default router available.
> 
> It'd be nice if in.routed were smart enough to ignore RTM_LOSING when
> there are generally a lack of alternatives, and not just for RDISC.  Any
> time we're about to do accelerated (or even perhaps _normal_) age-out of
> a route, and removal would mean that there's no longer a path to that
> subnet, then making sure it lingers as metric 15 instead would be a bit
> smarter.

Ok, let me think about that one..

> table.c
>   1240: consider printing the symbolic address rather than raw hex;
>       use naddr_ntoa().

Ok.

>   2265,2296,2450: is a sowmini stop like a bus stop or a command?  ;-}

Oops. I wonder where that came from. 

--Sowmini


_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to