> I don't see how that is possible in the current code. softmac has its > hooks firmly entrenched in the current code. Additionally, it looks > like the vanity renaming bits are part of softmac. So I firmly contest > the notion that this code will *ever* be separable.
That's the part that needs to be moved out. > (Now in theory I suppose you could move the vanity naming into mac, and > leave the DLPI legacy support, but I'm of a firm belief that there is > very little value in that. The kernel memory savings compared to the > rest is probably simply not worth it.) I disagree. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
