On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 17:02 +0200, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: > Sebastien Roy wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 16:40 +0200, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: > >> Hm, too bad. It would be very nice (for me at least) to be able to turn > >> machines on and off as I need them. > >> > >> I have a bunch of older, white label machines that I use to to large > >> scale test of distributed software on but I only need them now and them. > >> Too bad I don't have the knowledge to hack kernels :/ I'm willing to > >> test any solution if anyone else can develop it though! > > > > Having systems connected to a remote power control unit is a good way to > > do this in a generic way without being dependent on any OS feature. > > True, but it is also more expensive and complicated as I have to first > shut down the computer, wait that to complete and then power it off.
Yep, just merely offering ideas for alternatives. :-) -Seb _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
