> > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jgmills/ws-6713844/ > > > > Nice work tracking this down; the fix looks > > reasonable to me. > > However, this appears to be CR 6613359, not 6713844. > > Ah, I got the number from one but used my own generic title! > It probably fixes both of them. I used the manifest omission in > `6713844 luupgrade skipped inetd.xml update in non-global zones' > to reproduce the problem. My analysis of the core was the same as > `6613359 inetd dumps core if inetd_start method is not specified' > So, it actually was 6713844 that I fixed.
It seems these are two bugs covering the same issue. As such, our practice is to close the newer one out as a duplicate of the older one. The older one has an engineer assigned (Alan Maguire, CC'd) -- Alan, are you fine with transitioning this CR to Gary's sponsor? -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
