On (03/18/10 15:43), Peter Memishian wrote:
>
> > Out of curiosity, I tried on another similar machine with
> > two NICs (nge0, nge1) where nwam is not in use, and found
> > no problems. Then I did "ifconfig nge1 plumb"; again no
> > problem, then "ifconfig nge1 up" and _bingo_ bug! But -
> > the error 128 condition only lasts for a few minutes!
>
> Hmm, sounds like some problem with duplicate address detection;
> is ill->ill_ipif->ipif_addr_ready still zero for that time period?
That can't be it: the ipif_addr_ready bit was set on all the nge
interface in Gordon's output (which he says he got just before the
error 126 return):
> # mdb -k
:
> > ::ipif -v
> ADDR NAME CNT ILL STFLAGS
> FLAGS
> LCLADDR
> BROADCAST
:
> ffffff0469a42538 nge0 0 ffffff046cedec28
> UP,ADR
> |
> +---> 0 ipif_refcnt
> Active consistent reader cnt
> 192.168.1.40/24
> 192.168.1.255
> ffffff0763f89c60 nge1 0 ffffff04daa48ea8
> UP,ADR
> |
> +---> 0 ipif_refcnt
> Active consistent reader cnt
> 0.0.0.0/8
> 0.0.0.0
(Having ADR set on that one is a bit odd, but...)
> ffffff0469a392a0 vboxnet0 0 ffffff046cede8a8
> UP,ADR
> |
> +---> 0 ipif_refcnt
> Active consistent reader cnt
> 192.168.56.1/24
> 192.168.56.255
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
