> can anyone judge on the question if 6583577 could be a duplicate of 6732854 > or > is there evidence that this is an independent issue which has not been fixed > since snv_99?
When 6583577 was closed out, it was suspected to be a duplicate of 6732854, 6486764, or 6373420, but it's inconclusive. In any case, AFAIK no one has seen it in over a year. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list networking-discuss@opensolaris.org
