On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 06:18, Tom Parker wrote: > On 19 May 2005 18:21:44 -0400, Jonathan Blandford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > though putting this particular project under the GNU GPL makes a lot > > more sense to me. > > Given also the existing licensing of NetworkManager under the GPL, and > that some people (myself included) may well partially decide their > level of contribution to a project based on its license, I would > prefer if it became GPLed. Admittedly, I can't see a commercial > company seeing any point in making a forked proprietary version of a > DBUS DHCP program, but you never know... > What would be the problem with that ?
> Best to have *some* license on it, rather than just "distributable". Why ? > The choice in the end is up to the copyright holder. Jason? > I'll put the string "GPL" in the .spec file in the next release - it makes no difference to me. Regards, Jason Vas Dias. _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
