-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Colin Walters wrote: > If Gentoo and/or Ubuntu are taking the stance that no application can > modify resolv.conf and must be patched to use some other interface, we > can support that I guess, but: > > >>Of course, Colin won't like it. > > > Right, because I'd rather work on integrating NetworkManager fully and > in the meantime just work around incompatibility > (e.g. Conflicts: resolvconf). > > Personally, I am just a user, and not a Gentoo dev (though I am considering applying), and I am not a fan of resolv.conf being a symlink to somewhere else. But that is just me - the problem is mainly, that it doesn't have to be, but it can be - and I believe with the new version of baselayout in the works, that it WILL be a symlink by default. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC7qE21c+EtXTHkJcRAgnUAJ9nBPJ8Ih7K8q9Z9P+VVOHfL1sM5gCfQ65O AQS3Um9hb4uN+bpEj6ZyfNQ= =i0aB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
