> This sounds useful and necessary... We knew that vpnc only does a > subset of the stuff that VPNs need to do. So we expect to grow out > support for additional capabilities as time goes on, and we really do > need at least one more VPN connector implemented to get an idea of what > else is needed. If you come up with things that the current VPN > connector support falls short on, that's a good thing :) > > There's also issues in NetworkManager itself, since we kind of assume a > tunnel device and the operations surrounding that. I think OpenSWAN > uses a different mechanism (in-kernel IPSec packet generation or > something?) which would require changes to NM vpn setup code as well.
Yeah. did notice that cisco using the tunnel device. We are basically trying to get in a variation of in-kernel IPSec VPN (IPSectools - a brach off KAME project) into NM. > > But we expected that. So please tell us where stuff needs to get > modified to support whichever VPN client you're attempting to integrate. Will consolidate the changes that we would require from NM-VPN connector and send in asap. > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
