On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 21:32 -0500, Robert Love wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 20:43 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote: > > > Ah, I see. Ok, so something like this might be more appropriate? > > Basically > > back to the original posters concept. More elses could be added as > > appropriate. > > Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind. Good work! > > > Additionally I moved the set_freq outside the if() which still works for me. > > The set_mode really seems to be the thing causing the problem. Having that > > outside the if caused that same hang. In that case it's not even clear that > > the 2nd part of the patch is needed although it certainly seems like the > > right > > thing to do. > > So ... this works for you? Good. > > I would be curious if you needed the second hunk. The reason being is > that Dan doesn't want to put these driver-specific hacks in NM (with > good reason), but the first hunk makes more sense.
So which hunk of this patch seems to fix the problem? The first part for the set_mode, or the second part passing the ndiswrapper driver to wpa_supplicant? Dan _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
