On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:57 -0500, Darren Albers wrote: > > I have had other bug reports that users need DHCP timeouts in the 30~40 > > second range. To be sure, most ifup scripts wait longer than 25s. > > > > I think a timeout in the 30-40 second range would also resolve the > issues with portfast...
45 or so is generally what's claimed. But this isn't a good answer for spanning tree -- it means if you really don't have dhcp on your network, we're punishing you by making you wait extra long for before falling back to other methods. -- Peter, who has learned a serious hatred for STP. _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
