Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Oh, it isn't? Hmm... Then what does that mean for a VPN situation?
>> When I VPNC into my corporate net I need to use the corporate DNS servers.
>> If I'm using named..... How would this work right now?
>
> If you start a VPN, all DNS traffic is funneled to the corporate
> nameservers that the VPN reports back to NM. If split DNS were running,
> you'd only use the corporate nameservers for addresses ending in the
> corporate domain name that the VPN provided, or ones you specified in
> the VPN config, instead of everything. Think of it like the split
> routing that we've already got.
Fair enough. I guess I can wait until this gets integrated in. I
thought it had already, but I guess not. Oh well. A local caching
nameserver is "better", anyways.
> Dan
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
NetworkManager-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
