Quoting Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > - do static routes -always- have a netmask of 0xffffffff?
>>
>> -host routes do. -net routes do not.
>
> So would the patch need to do additional checking for the routes
> returned by the DHCP server to determine whether the last bit is 0 or
> something? If so, what netmask would be used instead?
I'm afraid I didn't look at the patch, but how does a static route
have anything to do with DHCP? (Maybe I'd understand if I looked
at the patch).. Generally when I think of static routes I think
"I know how to get to host X or net Y/Z" -- so if it's a static
host route I only need to know the host address, and if it's a static
network route I need the network and netmask. These numbers would
need to be part of the static route configuration.
> Dan
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
NetworkManager-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
