Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jon Escombe wrote:
>
>> ----- "Aaron Konstam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Now we are really getting into black magic. I changed the lines:
>>>
>>> %prep
>>> %setup -q
>>> %patch0 -p1 -b .startup-dhcdbd
>>> %patch2 -p1 -b .linkdebug
>>> %patch3 -p1 -b .no-killswitch-fix
>>> %patch4 -p1 -b .LEAP_passwd
>>>
>>> # unpack the applet
>>> tar -xjf %{SOURCE1}
>>> %patch1 -p1 -b .buildfix
>>>
>>> To:
>>>
>>> %prep
>>> %setup -q
>>> %patch0 -p1 -b .startup-dhcdbd
>>> %patch2 -p1 -b .linkdebug
>>> %patch3 -p1 -b .no-killswitch-fix
>>>
>>> # unpack the applet
>>> tar -xjf %{SOURCE1}
>>> %patch1 -p1 -b .buildfix
>>> %patch4 -p1 -b .LEAP_passwd
>>>
>>> and now executing rpmbuild -ba gives a successful compile.
>>>
>>> Will someone confirm that this is ok and I can install the rpms
>>> produced.?
>>>
>> Ah yes, that would have done it..
>> The first example would be trying to patch the applet source code before it
>> had been unpacked.
>>
>
> Makes me wonder how those other patches are supposed to be getting
> applied (the 3 that occur before the unpack).
>
It's just the gnome applet which gets unpacked separately, those first
few patches are against the main program code.
Regards,
Jon.
_______________________________________________
NetworkManager-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
