Thank you Dan. How can I help to fix this problem?
openSUSE 10.2 patch por NW+madwifi doesn't fix this problem. El Wednesday 25 July 2007 07:47:46 Dan Williams escribió: > > 'iwlist' shows the right values. > > No, it doesn't. You'll note that the Quality reported by iwlist is > completely bogus: > > Quality=30/70 Signal level=-65 dBm Noise level=-95 dBm > > The first # is the difference between signal and noise, which certainly > doesn't conform to the WEXT specification. Second, what does the > atheros driver set in the reported quality flags? What does it call > valid? NM uses the quality reported by the driver as valid before it > falls back to a signal/noise ratio. > > In any case, there are also OpenSUSE patches that special-case madwifi > signal quality reporting in NM which could also be malfunctioning. > > It could be that NM is getting the calculations wrong. However, madwifi > has misreported quality for so long that I'm skeptical. > > Dan -- Xavier Callejas International Bonded Couriers Logística Integrada El Salvador SAL: +503 2250-5900 VoIP: +1 (212) 796-4925 IBC USA: +1 888 SHIP IBC http://www.ibcinc.com ¡Toda una Organización Mundial a Su Servicio! ------------------------------------------------------ Open Your Mind, Use Open Source. _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
