On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 10:36 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:52 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > > > Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm > > > thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will > > > overwrite resolv.conf. What is the recommendation? > > > > With 0.7 we need to rethink the caching nameserver stuff. The code is > > still there to talk to named, but we should probably rip it out and make > > it more modular so people can use it with dnsmasq, resolvconf, other > > tools, etc. > > > > Dan > > In the interim, how about this: Have nm read a config file /etc/nm.config, > which includes an option 'dont_overwrite_resolv.conf'?
Not really; that's got a lot of potential for abuse and sends the wrong message. How would DNS information from NM get to the caching nameserver? Dan _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
