will you pls quit sending to me,
---------------------- Original Message: --------------------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Subject: NetworkManager-list Digest, Vol 39, Issue 18 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:08:48 +0000 > Send NetworkManager-list mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of NetworkManager-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Fwd: NetworkManager no-go (Dan Williams) > 2. Re: ppp using NM (Tambet Ingo) > 3. Re: scan list limitation -- doesn't like 127 APs? (Derek Atkins) > 4. Re: Another dropped connection with iwl3945 and NM-0.6.5 on > FC7 (Derek Atkins) > 5. Re: ppp using NM (Jon Escombe) > 6. Re: VPN API (Jon Escombe) > 7. Re: ppp using NM (Dan Williams) > 8. Re: VPN API (Casey Harkins) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:56:23 -0500 > From: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Fwd: NetworkManager no-go > To: Yasha Karant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 19:07 -0800, Yasha Karant wrote: > > I have been informed that the behavior below evidently is a bug > > in NetworkManager. I am using NetworkManager Applet 0.6.4 under > > RHEL 5, and NetworkManager and NetworkManagerDispatcher 0.6.5 . > > > > NetworkManager did not offer me any choices in network, nor did it > > change from the pre-existing channel 11 under the circumstances > > below. > > > > Is this a bug? If so, what is the fix? > > Best thing to do is to file a bug in Red Hat bugzilla and then we can > diagnose this issue further. If you could put some more details into > the bug report, like: > > 1) What kernel version, what wireless card, and what driver the card is > using > > 2) Attach a /var/log/messages that shows a NetworkManager connection > attempt to the bug report > > #2 is important; without that it's hard to figure out where things are > going wrong. > > Thanks, > Dan > > > > > > I have now tried NetworkManager on the University 802.11g from > > my office. No go. > > > > Here is the output from scan (I wrote a small script to run > > the scan > > and remind me that I needed to be root for the scan to work -- > > output > > captured via script in a typescript file): > > > > Script started on Tue 04 Dec 2007 11:34:40 AM PST > > ^[]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su > > Password: > > ^[]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ykarant]# ./iwlist-scan > > > > You need to be root to get a current scan > > > > eth1 Scan completed : > > Cell 01 - Address: 00:12:00:51:BC:60 > > ESSID:"CSUSB" > > Protocol:IEEE 802.11bg > > Mode:Master > > Channel:1 > > Encryption key:off > > Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 > > Mb/s; 9 Mb/s > > 11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 > > Mb/s; 36 Mb/s > > 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s > > Quality=82/100 Signal level=-48 dBm > > Extra: Last beacon: 27ms ago > > Cell 02 - Address: 00:15:F9:A6:76:80 > > ESSID:"CSUSB" > > Protocol:IEEE 802.11bg > > Mode:Master > > Channel:6 > > Encryption key:off > > Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 > > Mb/s; 9 Mb/s > > 11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 > > Mb/s; 36 Mb/s > > 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s > > Quality=31/100 Signal level=-81 dBm > > Extra: Last beacon: 724ms ago > > Cell 03 - Address: 00:1B:54:25:15:80 > > ESSID:"CSUSB" > > Protocol:IEEE 802.11bg > > Mode:Master > > Channel:6 > > Encryption key:off > > Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 > > Mb/s; 9 Mb/s > > 11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 > > Mb/s; 36 Mb/s > > 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s > > Quality=44/100 Signal level=-74 dBm > > Extra: Last beacon: 1058ms ago > > > > ^[]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ykarant]# exit > > exit > > ^[]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ Gexit > > exit > > > > At home, using /usr/sbin/system-config-network-gui (that does > > the same thing as manually editing the files, reloading, > > etc.), the WLAN is set to channel 11. NetworkManager only > > showed one CSUSB WLAN, and refused to connect. > > system-config-network-gui showed that the WNIC was still on > > channel 11. I manually changed this via > > system-config-network-gui to channel 1 (please see the scan > > above), and everything worked, including NetworkManager. > > However, NetworkManager would not automatically go to channel > > 1 nor would it allow me to choose channels. > > > > Is this fixable via a NetworkManager post-build configuration > > file? Is this fixable via a NetworkManager configuration file > > that is used during the build process? > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try > > it now. > > _______________________________________________ > > NetworkManager-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:38:07 +0200 > From: "Tambet Ingo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ppp using NM > To: "Jon Escombe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Dec 4, 2007 4:17 PM, Jon Escombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Good stuff, got connected first time ;) > > > > Only issues were that it didn't set up resolv.conf, and also added three > entries to the applet menu (as the card presents three ports). > > Both of these issues should be fixed in the SVN now. > > Tambet > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:46:15 -0500 > From: Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: scan list limitation -- doesn't like 127 APs? > To: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Can you file a bug on gnome.org? > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501835 > > -derek > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:47:04 -0500 > From: Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Another dropped connection with iwl3945 and NM-0.6.5 on > FC7 > To: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 19:02 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> Here's the dmesg output: > >> > >> eth1: RX deauthentication from 00:19:a9:47:56:91 (reason=1) > >> eth1: deauthenticated > >> eth1: authenticate with AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91 > >> eth1: RX authentication from 00:19:a9:47:56:91 (alg=0 transaction=2 > >> status=0) > >> eth1: authenticated > >> eth1: associate with AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91 > >> eth1: RX ReassocResp from 00:19:a9:47:56:91 (capab=0x1 status=0 aid=80) > >> eth1: associated > >> eth1: WMM queue=2 aci=0 acm=0 aifs=3 cWmin=15 cWmax=1023 burst=0 > >> eth1: WMM queue=3 aci=1 acm=0 aifs=7 cWmin=15 cWmax=1023 burst=0 > >> eth1: WMM queue=1 aci=2 acm=0 aifs=2 cWmin=7 cWmax=15 burst=30 > >> eth1: WMM queue=0 aci=3 acm=0 aifs=2 cWmin=3 cWmax=7 burst=15 > >> eth1: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91 - assume out of range > >> eth1: No STA entry for own AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91 > >> eth1: No STA entry for own AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91 > >> bridge-eth1: disabling the bridge > >> bridge-eth1: down > >> bridge-eth1: enabling the bridge > >> bridge-eth1: up > > > > Looks like the driver decided that the AP had gone away. It probably > > missed too many beacons or probe responses due to the RF heavy > > environment or something? Could need a driver tweak. > > Maybe. It's the iwl3945. Maybe it was scanning? ;) > The IETF really is a great testbed. Frustrating as a user, > but a great testbed. > > > Dan > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:38:45 +0000 > From: Jon Escombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ppp using NM > To: Tambet Ingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Tambet Ingo wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2007 4:17 PM, Jon Escombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Good stuff, got connected first time ;) > >> > >> Only issues were that it didn't set up resolv.conf, and also added three > entries to the applet menu (as the card presents three ports). > >> > > > > Both of these issues should be fixed in the SVN now. > > > > Tambet > > > > Confirmed, thanks! > Jon. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:42:35 +0000 > From: Jon Escombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: VPN API > To: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 09:28 +0000, Jon Escombe wrote: > > > >> Casey Harkins wrote: > >> > >>> If you're interested, the attached patch fixes the glade issue as well > >>> as an improper key being used in a hash table. I just started looking > >>> into the auth dialog which is also failing for me. > >>> > >>> -casey > >>> > >> Thanks, that patch has got the configuration dialogs working here. But > >> having got that bit further, it's now failing to save the configuration > >> to gconf... Still - it's all moving in the right direction ;) > >> > > > > Working on that; should be fixed in an hour or so. That particular > > issue affected all VPN plugins. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > Thanks, I see the connection configuration is getting written into gconf > now. > > Still not quite working yet though, now onto an "Invalid connection" > error when I attempt to start the VPN, will keep digging ;) > > Regards, > Jon > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:57:59 -0500 > From: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ppp using NM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 18:38 +0000, Jon Escombe wrote: > > Tambet Ingo wrote: > > > On Dec 4, 2007 4:17 PM, Jon Escombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Good stuff, got connected first time ;) > > >> > > >> Only issues were that it didn't set up resolv.conf, and also added three > entries to the applet menu (as the card presents three ports). > > >> > > > > > > Both of these issues should be fixed in the SVN now. > > > > > > Tambet > > > > > > > Confirmed, thanks! > > Latest bits are in > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=276538 > > too, which should get pushed out as an update. I haven't disabled the > PPP functionality for F8 updates because you still need the .fdi file to > enable the 3G cards for now. > > Dan > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:05:49 -0600 > From: Casey Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: VPN API > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Jon Escombe wrote: > > Dan Williams wrote: > >> On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 09:28 +0000, Jon Escombe wrote: > >> > >>> Casey Harkins wrote: > >>> > >>>> If you're interested, the attached patch fixes the glade issue as > >>>> well as an improper key being used in a hash table. I just started > >>>> looking into the auth dialog which is also failing for me. > >>>> > >>>> -casey > >>>> > >>> Thanks, that patch has got the configuration dialogs working here. > >>> But having got that bit further, it's now failing to save the > >>> configuration to gconf... Still - it's all moving in the right > >>> direction ;) > >>> > >> > >> Working on that; should be fixed in an hour or so. That particular > >> issue affected all VPN plugins. > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks, I see the connection configuration is getting written into gconf > > now. > > > > Still not quite working yet though, now onto an "Invalid connection" > > error when I attempt to start the VPN, will keep digging ;) > > > > I've got that one solved too. I'll get a patch up soon (right now the > code is littered with a ridiculous number of nm_debug calls). I'm able > to initiate the vpn connection from nm-applet and the openvpn binary is > getting called but erroring out. I can manually run the openvpn binary > using the same options and connect to the management interface and > everything works. Pretty close to getting it working. > > > > -casey > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > NetworkManager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list > > > End of NetworkManager-list Digest, Vol 39, Issue 18 > *************************************************** _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
