----- "Dan Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- Initiating the openvpn connection through NM gives me this: > > > > # ip route > > default dev tap0 scope link > > > > so it changes the default route from ppp0 to tap0, but doesn't retain a > > specific route to the VPN server over ppp0 - so the tunnel stalls. Also > > doesn't add a gateway (however - this may be related to the problem above). > > With vpnc this definitely isn't a problem; that's what the "gateway" > address bits are for. NM will ensure that there is always a route to > the VPN server via the connected interface. That's how it should work > in openvpn too, but maybe openvpn plugin isn't setting the right bits in > NMIP4Config? > > Dan
Ok, that problem must be related to the ppp connection. I've just connected from another site and been more successful. openvpn from NM: 82.x.x.174 via 192.168.10.1 dev wlan0 192.168.10.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.10 default dev tap0 scope link openvpn from command line: 82.x.x.174 via 192.168.10.1 dev wlan0 192.168.1.0/24 dev tap0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.95 192.168.10.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.10 default via 192.168.1.1 dev tap0 Looking at the relevant output from each case nm-openvpn[13453]: /sbin/ip link set dev tap0 up mtu 1500 nm-openvpn[13453]: /sbin/ip addr add dev tap0 192.168.1.95/24 broadcast 192.168.1.255 nm-openvpn[13453]: /usr/bin/nm-openvpn-service-openvpn-helper tap0 1500 1574 192.168.1.95 255.255.255.0 init nm-openvpn[13453]: /sbin/ip route add 82.x.x.174/32 via 192.168.10.1 nm-openvpn[13453]: ERROR: Linux route add command failed: shell command exited with error status: 2 nm-openvpn[13453]: /sbin/ip route del 0.0.0.0/0 nm-openvpn[13453]: /sbin/ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 via 192.168.1.1 nm-openvpn[13453]: Initialization Sequence Completed /sbin/ip link set dev tap0 up mtu 1500 /sbin/ip addr add dev tap0 192.168.1.95/24 broadcast 192.168.1.255 /sbin/ip route add 82.x.x.174/32 via 192.168.10.1 /sbin/ip route del 0.0.0.0/0 /sbin/ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 via 192.168.1.1 Initialization Sequence Completed So the only thing that looks different is that one of the route additions fails, and this was also the case in 6.5. I've no idea why as the commands are exactly the same? I'll try to debug the ppp case further, see what's different there that it's not liking.. Regards, Jon _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
