On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Bastien Nocera said: > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 11:58 +0100, Will Stephenson wrote: > <snip> > > > Does that mean that we need extra development to support HDSPA/UTMS > > networks? Does "CDMA" in NetworkManager only literally support CDMA > > networks? > > No, they're already supported. The CDMA and GSM bits in NetworkManager > refer to the command sets used by the different technologies, not to the > over-the-air technologies.
Then I misunderstood. > > If that's the case, obviously the API naming is fine as is. Otherwise we > > should make it more generic. > > More generic for what? They have different command sets, so they use > different implementations in NM. I mean that when a class of cellular technologies are served by one NetworkManager component, the name of that component should be a generic name, not the name of one of a member of that class. Will _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
