Am Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 17:09:54 schrieb Tambet Ingo: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Will Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > rationale: Helmut told me that this had already been discussed, and that > > because you could imagine Connection.Activate( Device ) or > > Device.Activate( Connection) it was decided to put it on the manager. If > > this was communicated properly, this is a worst of all compromise. > > Since Connection is on the settings service, the action can't be carried > > out there, so stay object-oriented and move this to Device. > > > > As I'm wrapping NM in Solid for KDE 4, I'll probably move this method > > onto the Device class anyway, but moving it in NM would be better for > > both projects IMO. > > It was never a discussion between Connection.Activate(Device) vs > Device.Activate(Connection). The current solution isn't a compromise
This came up some time ago at [1]. But you're right, the arguments were somewhat different. Helmut [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07328.html _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
