On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:55:00PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 19:26 +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:01:14PM +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > probably need to poke Thomas about this one, before I start > > > > instrumenting iproute2 to dump the netlink packets it sends, doing the > > > > same for libnl, and see what's different. > > > > > > I'm on it, I can reproduce it (and I've already dumped libnl vs iproute). > > > > got it, we have to set the scope to RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, there's an XXX in > > libnl: > > /* XXX Change to UNIVERSE if gw || nexthops */ > > > > so I should add rtnl_route_set_scope(route, RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE); to all > > patches that add a route with a gateway. > > > > Should I resend them ? (or preferably fix libnl first ?) > > Lets not block on libnl though, just fix up and resend patch #2. Both > #1 and #3 work fine for me. We can poke thomas to fix libnl in > parallel, or we can come up with patches for it ourselves and push them > to him.
#3 should need it too, I'll resend. (I've tested nl-route-add dst 10.0.0.3 via 192.168.0.124 dev wlan0, and it fails without the right scope) regards, Benoit -- :wq _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
