OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du mardi 27 mai 2008, vers 16:03, Dan
Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Is strongswan a fork of openswan? If so, was openswan upstream
> reluctant to take certain patches and thus the strongswan fork? Is
> there an intention to merge strongswan back into openswan in the future?
> That sort of thing. Unfortunately the politics matter to distros...
I don't have why strongswan exists along side openswan. OpenSWAN has a
strong tie to L2TP because Xelerance (which is the company behind
OpenSWAN) is editing xl2tpd as well and is planning to publish a new
version of OpenSWAN able to cooperate with OpenSWAN. However, this is
only important for running a server. On client side, I don't really
think this is important.
--
/* Nobody will ever see this message :-) */
panic("Cannot initialize video hardware\n");
2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/arch/m68k/atari/atafb.c
_______________________________________________
NetworkManager-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
