On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 18:37 +0100, Rick Jones wrote: > --On Friday, October 24, 2008 10:51:58 -0400 Dan Williams > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ¦ On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 11:16 +0100, Rick Jones wrote: > ¦ > I can get the Palm software modem to work using this init string, > with > ¦ > no other changes: > ¦ > > ¦ > AT&F\rATV1 X4 &C1 +CREG=0 > ¦ > ¦ The CREG gets handled later, can you try without that and let NM do > the > ¦ magic further on? > > This was one of the first problems I encountered. Without this the > response to +CREG? is 1,1, but NM is looking for 0,1. The first digit > in the CREG query is the CREG mode (if that's the right term). Anyway, > it's whatever the value +CREG= is set to. It seems most modems default > to 0, but this one defaults to 1, so needs init'ing to 0.
Ah right, yeah. > ¦ ModemManager (the future direction of modem handling > ¦ with NM) will support workarounds for devices like this, provided > that > ¦ they can be detected somehow. > > Sounds useful. > > ¦ Can you report the ATI output for the modem? That should work no > matter > ¦ what, or else you _really_ need to cluebat the Palm software > provider. > > Response to ATI is LowRider. ATI0 returns ERROR, ATI1 returns R01.92, > all other ATIn return blank. Ugh. At least file a bug with them to return the +GCAP output in the ATI response like most other GSM cards appear to do. If it's a CDMA palm, it can't hurt to return +GCAP anyway. Dan _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
