Hi Dan, On Friday 27 February 2009 23:36:49 Dan Williams wrote: > Ok, so it apparently sometimes needs an autoreconf then, and no > patching? Just trying to make sure what needs (or doesn't) need to be > done here. Is one of the patches in this thread required?
if you're patching .am file, you need autoreconf to regenerate .in file. If you're using tarball and patch Makefile.am, than your patch won't make any difference until you regenerate Makefile.in (with autoreconf). If you're using svn as your source - autogen.sh will run autoreconf automatically. The second patch in this thread (by Mikhail Efremov) fixes the issue. Thanks, Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
