Howard Chu wrote: > I know what it does. Now please think about system integrity, read-only > root filesystems, and needless rewriting of system files, particularly > in the context of laptops with hard power constraints. Think about > premature wear-out of SSDs caused by repeated overwriting of files. > resolvconf is not a good idea.
Using tmpfs to hold volatile state for RO or limited write media is nothing new. Such sites normally have /var/run mounted as such and /etc/resolv.conf as a symlink to an updateable location on tmpfs. And when using dbus + dnsmasq + static /etc/resolv.conf no configuration file needs updating. resolvconf is a very good idea. Thanks Roy _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
