2009/4/30 Marc Herbert <[email protected]> > David Sundqvist a écrit : > > > If I set it to be managed by NM, will NM try to manage it in any way? > > Can I set it to be seen, but still unmanaged? Or maybe I could get NM > > to always output a connected status instead of a no-connection which > > triggers firefox offline mode, etc. (should the connection be lost, > > well, then NM won't be able to detect it anyway due to being frozen on > > the first page touch). > > There seems to be something fundamentally wrong in this no-connection/ > /offline thing. Since NM can be configured to manage _not all_ > interfaces (including none at all) then why are some applications > wrongly assuming NM is always managing the entire network > configuration? This seems to be where the bug lies and should be > fixed. > > Is there other buggy applications that people should be afraid of > besides firefox?
Firefox, pidgin, gajim, epiphany-browser, synapse, etc. quite a few of them > > > _______________________________________________ > NetworkManager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list > -- Pablo Martí http://www.linkedin.com/in/pmarti || http://www.warp.es python -c "print '706d6172746940776172702e6573'.decode('hex')"
_______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
